Simplified per-diem rates boosted for post-September 30 business travel
Rev Proc 2006-41, 2006-43 IRB
Many companies use per-diem rates to reimburse their employees for business travel
expenses rather than requiring employees to submit receipts for their expenditure.
The IRS recently increased the simplified per-diem rate (high-low per-diem rate)
for post September 30 business travel expenses. Employers may begin using the new
rates immediately or wait until January 1, 2007 to implement them.
Per-Diem Reimbursement Method:
Regular actual per-diem method:
An employer may pay a per-diem amount to an employee for business-travel expense
reimbursement. If the rate paid doesn’t exceed IRS-approved maximums, and employee
provides simplified substantiation (time, place and business purpose), the reimbursement
is treated as made under an accountable plan, which is not subject to income or
payroll tax withholding.
IRS-approved per-diem maximum is the GSA (General Services Administration) per-diem
rate paid by the federal government to its workers on travel status. It usually
contains two components: one for lodging expense and the other for meals and incidental
expenses (M&IE) such as laundry and pressing of clothing, tips for services,
mailing cost, etc. These rates effective October 1, 2006 for federal are available
on the website at http://www.gsa.gov.
High-low per-diem method:
As an alternative, an employer may use a simplified high-low per-diem method, under
which there is one uniform per-diem rate for all high-cost areas within CONUS (Continental
U.S.) and another rate for all other areas within CONUS.
Compared to previous rate applying to travel on or after October 1, 2005, simplified
high-low per-diem has been boosted for post September 30, 2006 business travel by
$20 and $7 for high-cost areas and non-high-cost localities respectively. Specifically,
the high-cost-area per-diem is $246, consisting of $188 for lodging and $58 for
M&IE. That for all other localities is $148, consisting of $103 for lodging
and $45 for M&IE.
High-Low Per-Diem Rate:
|
|
Rate effective October 1, 2006 |
Rate effective October 1, 2005 |
|
High-Cost Area |
Non-High-Cost Area |
High-Cost Area |
Non-High-Cost Area |
|
Lodging rate ($) |
188 |
103 |
168 |
96 |
|
M&IE rate ($) |
58 |
45 |
58 |
45 |
|
Combined per-diem ($) |
246 |
148 |
226 |
141 |
In the meantime, high-cost and non-high-cost localities are periodically updated
by the IRS. This time, five localities – Santa Barbara, CA; South Lake Tahoe, CA;
Fort Lauderdale, FL; Fort Walton Beach/DeFuniak Springs, FL; and Stuart, FL – are
added to the list of high-cost areas, while a number are dropped from that list,
such as Napa, CA; Bar Harbor, ME; and Conway, NH. Besides, modifications are made
for the date of seasonal-attraction localities to qualify as high-cost area, and
the definition of certain localities.
What’s more, transition rules are worth noticing here. On the one hand, a taxpayer
using actual per-diem method for the first nine months of 2006 cannot use the high-low
per-diem method until January 1, 2007. On the other hand, a taxpayer, using high-low
per-diem method for the first nine months of 2006, must continue using such method.
However, in terms of per-diem rate, he/she may have two choices: (i) he/she may
immediately use new per-diem rate effective October 1, 2006, (ii) he/she may continue
using old per-diem rate for the rest of 2006 and begin to use new rate from January
1, 2007.
Transition Rule for Per-Diem Application:
|
|
Per-Diem Method |
Per-Diem Rate |
|
Choice I |
Choice II |
|
Actual Per-Diem |
Must use actual per-diem method for the rest of 2006
|
Immediately use GSA rates effective October 1, 2006
|
Use old per-diem rates for the rest of 2006, if those rates are used for the last
three months of 2006
|
|
High-Low Per-Diem |
Must use high-low per-diem method for the rest of 2006
|
Immediately use new per-diem rates effective October 1, 2006
|
Use old per-diem rates for the rest of 2006
|
Other optional methods for per-diem:
(I) M&IE-only per-diem: Under the following circumstances, an
employee may receive a per-diem reimbursement only for his/her M&IE during the
business trip:
(i) An employer reimburses actual lodging costs;
(ii) An employer provides lodging in kind;
(iii) An employer pays the lodging directly;
(iv) An employer reasonably believes the worker will not incur lodging expenses
(e.g., live in the house of relatives); or
(v) An employer bases his calculation on a method similar to that used for wages
like hour worked, miles traveled.
If simplified substantiation is supplied, rate doesn’t exceed federal M&IE rate,
and one of circumstances listed above happens, the MI&E paid is deemed as paid
under an accountable plan.
(II) Incidental-expense-only deduction: For employees who don’t pay
or incur meals expense for a calendar day (or partial day) in away-from-home travel,
optional per-diem rate for “incidental expenses only” is set as $3 per day.
(III) Transportation industry per-diem: Taxpayers in the transportation
industry paying a per-diem only for M&IE may have a special tax treatment. The
IRS recognizes the unusual demands on employees and owners in transportation industry,
and offers them some liberal deduction at tax time. Generally, a special $52 per-diem
for M&IE applies for travel within the CONUS, while $58 per-diem for travel
elsewhere.
Accountable Plan:
Just now, “accountable plan” has been mentioned again and again. Sound familiar?
It is an important factor for a taxpayer to properly account for employee business
expenses on tax return, since not all employee business expenses are deductible
for AGI (Adjusted Gross Income) as trade or business expenses.
In general, the IRS restricts the deduction for AGI to those situations in which
employees are reimbursed for their expenses under an accountable plan, which requires
employees make an adequate accounting of their expenses with their employer (e.g.,
keeping records invoice, paid bill, receipt, etc.) and return excess reimbursement
to the employer. Regarding tax treatment, the distinction between accountable and
nonaccountabe plan lies in two areas: (i) Are the reimbursed expenses included miscellaneous
itemized deductions, subject to limitation of 2% of AGI? (ii) Who (employer or employee)
is subject to 50% limitation on meals on the business travel? Specifically, employees
who receive reimbursements from a nonaccountable plan may deduct their expenses
only as miscellaneous itemized deductions. Besides, the deduction taken for meals
costs is subject to the 50% limitation on meals before applying the overall 2% of
AGI limitation.
Tax Treatment of Employee’s Meal Expense on Different Reimbursement Plan:
|
|
Employer's tax deduction |
Employee's tax deduction |
|
Accountable plan |
Employer gets deduction for expense in corporate tax return, but the expense is
subject to the 50% limitation on meals.
|
No 50% rule for meals applies. That is, all meals expense reimbursed is deductible,
but such expenses should be includable in employee’s gross income.
|
|
Nonaccountable plan |
Full of meals expense reimbursed to employee is deductible as reasonable business
or trade expense.
|
Not only does 50% limitation on meals apply, but also all reimbursed meal expense
is considered miscellaneous itemized deduction, subject to 2% of AGI limitation.
|
In this regard, in a high-cost area, the employer with an accountable plan takes
a per-diem deduction of $217 ($188+$29), while the employer’s deduction for non-high-cost-area
per-diem only amounts to $125.50 ($103+$22.5). However, no 50% limitation applies
to the incidental-expense-only per-diem. With special per-diem rule applied to transportation
industry, the employer may deduct 75% of the per-diem meals accordingly, and from
2008 on, the percentage will increase to 80%.
Self-employed Individuals:
Self-employed individuals may not choose allowable federal per-diem rate above mentioned,
however, both M&IE-only per-diem and incidental-expense-only per diem work for
them.
|