Bay Area CPA Firm Newsletter | Brochure | Careers | Community | Contact Us
Best of Best

Trusted Advisors to the Highly Successful - Since 1964

Skip Navigation Links
Services
Company
Reading Room
Tax Tools
Media
Careers
Skip Navigation Links

SERVICES
Tax Planning
Accounting
Consulting
Technology
Business Valuations
International Tax

COMPANY
About Us
History
Mission Statement
People
Clientele
Testimonials
Fremont Office
Palo Alto Office
Danville Office
San Francisco Office
Contact Us

READING ROOM
Reading Room
Business Leadership
Estate Planning
Investment
Real Estate
Taxation
Valuations
Humor
Online Resources

TAX TOOLS
Tax Tools
Tax Rate Guide
Tax Forms
Tax Due Dates
Record Retention
Glossary of Terms
State Links
1040 Tax Estimator
Mortgage Payoff
Mortgage Rent/Buy
Millionaire Calculator
Compound Interest

MEDIA
Company Media
Newsletter
Press Releases
Bookstore
Videos
Hall of Laughter

CAREERS
Careers
Job Openings
Internships
Submit Your Resume

409A Valuation Update: Private Companies and Stock Options

Jeff Faustby Jeff Faust, AVA

 

Companies shouldn’t wait until 2007 to establish valuation methods

Since the IRS issued Notice 2006-4 on December 23, 2005 many companies feel that they have continued flexibility in determining fair market value for stock option grant purposes and that they do not need to take action until the issuance of the final regulations, originally expected to be January 1, 2007, now extended to January 1, 2008.  Is this really the case?

Background

Under Section 409A, there are adverse tax consequences for option holders that have exercise prices below fair market value and that become exercisable after December 31, 2004.  To avoid this tax, 409A will require “a consistent application of a reasonable method that takes into consideration all relevant facts and circumstances.”

Timing

With respect to stock options granted before January 1, 2005, until further guidance is issued, where there was a good faith attempt to set the exercise price at fair market at the time of grant, such options will be treated as being excluded from the requirements of Section 409A.  Whether there was a good faith attempt to set the option price at fair market value depends on the relevant facts and circumstances.  In light of the transitional relief, companies that satisfy this good faith standard do not have to be concerned about the application of Section 409A to pre-2005 option grants unless those options were intentionally granted at a discount or provide a deferral feature.

With respect to stock options granted on or after January 1, 2005 and before the effective date of final regulations, Notice 2006-4 stated that companies could use any reasonable valuation method to determine fair market value.  The guidance provides transitional relief for private company stock options and the determination of fair market value.

Transition

Greenstein, Rogoff, Olsen & Co., LLP strongly suggests that private companies be conservative in their approach to determining the fair market value of their stock in connection with option grants and use this “transitional period” to establish their “consistent” methods of valuation. 

By obtaining a valuation report by an independent appraiser now, a company can ensure that their valuation methods will be in place when the final regulations under Section 409A become effective in early 2007.

For questions or comments, please feel free to contact Jeff Faust at (510) 797-8661 x249 or jfaust@groco.com.

NEWSLETTER

Subscribe to the best newsletter in the US!

Email:

Helping 
        You Along - QuicktimeHelping 
        You Along - Windows Media
More Videos Here

Positions Available

 
Copyright © 1997 - 2008. All rights reserved.
Toll-Free: 1-877-CPA-2006
Tel: 510-797-8661
Fax: 510-797-1791


Fremont n Palo Alto n Danville n San Francisco
Home n Site Map n Terms of Use n Privacy Policy n Become a Link Partner n Employee Login